<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOLD! An Apple TV set for $1060</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appletvhacks.net/2012/12/12/sold-an-apple-tv-set-for-1060/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appletvhacks.net/2012/12/12/sold-an-apple-tv-set-for-1060/</link>
	<description>Get more from your shiny box of joy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghostshadow</title>
		<link>http://www.appletvhacks.net/2012/12/12/sold-an-apple-tv-set-for-1060/#comment-255248</link>
		<dc:creator>ghostshadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appletvhacks.net/?p=3422#comment-255248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still not buying it. Not convinced at all. Apple doesn&#039;t need to release a tv. It&#039;s not really appropriate. They know how the box is doing I don&#039;t know if a dedicated television set would do any better. It certainly would cost them more than it does to replace a $99 box every year or two.  I&#039;d prefer them to stick with the box, it&#039;s more versatile, costs less to produce and if it fails, they can easily scrap it. A TV would be much more detrimental if it failed as a product.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still not buying it. Not convinced at all. Apple doesn&#8217;t need to release a tv. It&#8217;s not really appropriate. They know how the box is doing I don&#8217;t know if a dedicated television set would do any better. It certainly would cost them more than it does to replace a $99 box every year or two.  I&#8217;d prefer them to stick with the box, it&#8217;s more versatile, costs less to produce and if it fails, they can easily scrap it. A TV would be much more detrimental if it failed as a product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Practical</title>
		<link>http://www.appletvhacks.net/2012/12/12/sold-an-apple-tv-set-for-1060/#comment-255244</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Practical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appletvhacks.net/?p=3422#comment-255244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Touch interface on TV screens could be a bad idea - all those smudges.
Maybe just a multi-touch TV remote, like a magic mouse for your TV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touch interface on TV screens could be a bad idea &#8211; all those smudges.<br />
Maybe just a multi-touch TV remote, like a magic mouse for your TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wysiwyg</title>
		<link>http://www.appletvhacks.net/2012/12/12/sold-an-apple-tv-set-for-1060/#comment-255243</link>
		<dc:creator>Wysiwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appletvhacks.net/?p=3422#comment-255243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The status of smart TVs is the same as how smart phones were prior to 2007.  Everyone wants to do it, but there no standard or usability.  We need something revolutionary to set the standard. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The status of smart TVs is the same as how smart phones were prior to 2007.  Everyone wants to do it, but there no standard or usability.  We need something revolutionary to set the standard. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
